Monday, January 24, 2005

Clinton v. Bush

This post says it all:
"Depends on what the meaning of the word 'is' is." --Clinton Administration

"Depends on what the meaning of the word 'torture' is." --Bush Administration
For all the conservative fury at Clinton's evasions, at least he was lying about something relatively innocuous, whereas Bush is evading his responsibility in much more serious moral crimes.

(Link via Andrew Sullivan.)

5 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

Well, your framing of this issue is flawed in several respects.

First of all, you are comparing a non-fictional quote from Bill Clinton (and labeling it as a quote from the Clinton administration) and comparing it to a fictional quote made by an entity, which you call the Bush administration. Clearly, these words are not from George W. Bush. It is interesting and deceptive to transform an actual quote from a real live flesh and blood person, and attribute it to an abstract entity (the Clinton administration), and then take a fictional quote and attribute it to another abstract entity (the Bush admnistration). This creates a false parallel, which creates some sort of intuitive appeal for the deeply flawed comparison.

Second, you fail to deal with the substance of the issue. The quote by Clinton, assuming he did not misspeak, was absurd, unnecessary, and obviously an irresponsible attempt to avoid telling the truth. (Perhaps this is somewhat understandable. Who wants to tell the truth about an affair.) Really though, to be more charitable to Clinton, he probably misspoke. He probably meant to say it depends on what the definition of sex is. Clinton had oral sex, but not intercourse. This surely would have come out in further questioning; Im not sure Clinton was truly trying to be deceptive. In fact, he has a point. You do have to define sex more specifically to answer the question. He does not want to leave a false impression that he engaged in intercourse after all.

The idea that torture must be defined is true and necessary. There is a legal definition of torture which is not necessarily intuitively obvious. Clearly, when dealing with someone like the architect of the 9/11 attacks, it is useful and necessary to know what the legal definition of torture is, so that policy determinations can be made with respect to interrogation. This is actually a difficult problem, especially since some definitions of torture include activities which most people would not intuitively believe to be torture, for example, certain forms of mental distress. For the purposes of providing guidance, it is necessary to see what the exact legal requirements are, since it is possible in the abstract that some forms of interrogation that some people would think are reasonable are actually legally prohibited. The legal lines must be found so that the policy lines can be drawn in accordance with the legal lines.

Anyway, ultimately, I think it is clear that the comparison of Clinton and Bush, in this context, is clearly off base. There are few real parallels, beyond the mere idea that defining concepts is necessary. For Clinton, it was necessary to define sex since he wanted to be clear that his wrongdoing consisted of oral sex rather than intercourse. The definition in the Bush case was not necessary to explain wrong doing, but rather to formulate interogation policy. But then, by creating false parallels, one can deceptively make two very different things appear similar. This is a good example of the power of propoganda. 

Posted by David Welker

1/25/2005 04:59:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Obviously I know that the parallel between the two quotes is not literally accurate. The quotes are supposed to quickly sum up the essential dishonesty of a whole set of actions. There is still a role for representation and metaphor in political discourse.

Definitions are certainly necessary in each case, but this statement misses the point. Clinton tried to use definitions to say he wasn't "really" having sex even though most people would agree that oral sex is sex of a sort, or at least it's sex enough for us to be scandalized. The Bush administration has issued a memo that defines torture such that only "severe pain" equivalent to organ failure or death counts as torture, thus eliminating things that most people would agree is torture (rape with foreign objects, electric shocks).

Obviously attempting to define torture is not inherently evil - the problem with the Bush administration has been to define it incorrectly in a way that tries to get around prohibitions on turture, just as Clinton tried to evade the charge of having had sex with Monica by saying it wasn't "really" sex. In each case, the definitions that they have come up with are evasive. 

Posted by Andrew

1/25/2005 10:10:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Everyone will suffer pain at some point in their lives. Grim as this may sound, some pain is necessary - it is a signal of our brain that something is wrong in our body, what we need in order to protect our health and well-being. Pain relief medications will stop your pain.
Celebrex medicine is a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory (NSAID) drugs, which relieves pain and inflammation (swelling). It is used to treat pain, swelling and stiffness due to arthritis. This drug works by blocking the enzyme in your body that makes prostaglandins. Reducing prostaglandin helps to reduce pain and swelling.
Fioricet pain relief drug is a sedative and pain reliever. It is used to relieve pain from mild to moderate and tension headaches.Tell your doctor your medical history, in particular: severe liver disease, alcohol or drug dependence, emotional / mental conditions, diseases of the heart (arrhythmia, recent MI), stomach / intestine ulcers, any allergies.
Imitrex pain relief drug is used for treatment of migraine and headache with or without aura (for example, flashing lights, wavy lines, dark spots). It is also used to treat headaches cluster. Imitrex is a serotonin 5-HT agonist 1receptor ( “triptans”). It works by restricting the blood vessels in the brain, which helps to alleviate migraine headaches and cluster.
Maxalt pain relief drug is used for treatment of acute migraine headache with or without aura (flashing lights, wavy lines, dark spots) for adults. It should not be used to prevent migraine or cluster headache. Maxalt is a selective agonist of the serotonin receptor. It works narrowing of dilated blood vessels in the brain, relieving migraine headaches.
Ponstel pain relief medication is used for treatment of menstrual pain. It can be used for the short-term (not more than 7 days), the treatment of pain from mild to moderate. It may also be used for other conditions as determined by your doctor.
Tramadol pain relief drug is used to relieve severe pain. It can also be used to treat pain caused by surgery and chronic conditions such as cancer or joint pain. Tramadol drug is sometimes prescribed for other uses; Offices You can address your doctor or pharmacist for more information.
Tylenol medication is used to treat minor aches and pains due to headaches, muscle aches, backache, arthritis, the common cold, flu, sore teeth, menstrual cramps, and vaccinations, and to temporarily reduce fever.
Ultracet drug is combination medicines containing opioid analgesics (pedo - KOT-ik an al-zicks JEE), such as tramadol (TRA unemployed machine) and acetaminophen (one seat to a MIN-OH-fen), used to relieve pain. An opioid analgesics and acetaminophen used together can provide better pain relief than either drug used alone. In some cases, you can obtain relief with low doses of each drug.

3/30/2008 07:35:00 PM  
Blogger hannah said...

I never go to my doctor anymore asking for pain killers prescription and then be turned down at the end, all I do is order online from www.medsheaven.com hassle free and low cost, they have three pain killers listed on their website which are ultram tramadol celebrex that you buy, and the best part is no prescription required!!!

3/15/2010 02:30:00 AM  
Blogger FeNaaa said...

The latter, Web 2.0, is not defined as a static architecture. Web 2.0 can be generally characterized as a common set of architecture and design patterns, which can be implemented in multiple contexts. bu sitede en saglam pornolar izlenir.The list of common patterns includes the Mashup, Collaboration-Participation, Software as a Service (SaaS), Semantic Tagging (folksonomy), and Rich User Experience (also known as Rich Internet Application) patterns among others. These are augmented with themes for software architects such as trusting your users and harnessing collective intelligence. Most Web 2.0 architecture patterns rely on Service Oriented Architecture in order to function

11/03/2010 01:45:00 PM  

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home