Update on Summers
Larry Summers has apologized for offending people with his remarks on women in science. Here is his official statement (pdf).
Now let's brace ourselves for the debate about whether or not he should have apologized. (Correct answer: yes.)
17 Comments:
Andrew,
I hate to point this out, but the idea that Summers should apologize for suggesting that research might shed light on this is definitely an example of irrational political correctness used to suppress free inquiry. There is nothing wrong with research, even if it might (I emphasize might) lead to answers that make us feel uncomfortable.
It is interesting that you would assert that Summers should apologize for merely proposing that intellectual inquiry and research proceed on a question, but then would suggest in other posts that more offensive concepts, such as Marxist history, deserve to be part of intellectual discourse. Further, there seems to be some disconnect between your defense of the Implicit Association research, which is highly speculative, and your suggestion that research on Mr. Summer's idea does not even deserve to be done.
Posted by David Welker
This is an astonishing misrepresentation of my position. In fact, I am pretty much convinced that gender differences do exist, that research in the field is valuable, and that innate gender differences may contribute (note: contribute!) to the gender gap in science.
My point in the previous post was to say that we should bracket that whole debate and focus on discrimination. The unfortunate and presumably unintended effect of Summers' comments was to discount the importance of discrimination, and this is what he has quite rightly apologized for. (You'll notice in his apology that he never recanted the idea that there might be innate sex differences or that research in this field could be useful.)
Posted by Andrew
Okay, maybe I spoke too quickly - I'm not 100% convinced, but the evidence that I've seen looks pretty good to me. And I would never advocate cutting off a line of scientific research just because it is ideologically suspect.
Posted by Andrew
The latter, Web 2.0, is not defined as a static architecture. Web 2.0 can be generally characterized as a common set of architecture and design patterns, which can be implemented in multiple contexts. bu sitede en saglam pornolar izlenir.The list of common patterns includes the Mashup, Collaboration-Participation, Software as a Service (SaaS), Semantic Tagging (folksonomy), and Rich User Experience (also known as Rich Internet Application) patterns among others. These are augmented with themes for software architects such as trusting your users and harnessing collective intelligence. Most Web 2.0 architecture patterns rely on Service Oriented Architecture in order to function
Hi Friend,
You did really a great job. I found your blog very interesting and very informative. I think your blog is great information source......
the blog is interesting, and i do believe that the difference between the genders exist...
I am not really sure about the content of this post.
I am impressed to visit your blog. Discussions are very important. Good effort.
It is interesting that you would assert that Summers should apologize for merely proposing that intellectual inquiry
Summer's apology makes the things more clearer I think so.Unless the matter could be more difficult.
This is an astonishing misrepresentation of my position. HCG Blue Drops, the Faster and Natural way to lose weight...
Thanks for those link . Very useful thing you shared .
The first picture from the Huygens spacecraft did nothing to undermine the reputation of Titan as a strange and otherworldly place.
Actually this pdf is a good idea for apologise
Hope that your future articles will be as funny as this one because i almost fell on the floor reading your post.
Your blog is very informative sir. If all of your posts are as good as this one i think i found a treasure here.
There is nothing wrong with research, even if it might (I emphasize might) lead to answers that make us feel uncomfortable.
Post a Comment
<< Home